Your Questions About Sustainable Energy For All

admin answers:

First, it would solve 51 percent of the problems right there. It would eliminate the dependence of all nations on oil.

Second, it would result in all of the oil producing nations going bankrupt. That would leave them at the mercy of the rest of the world until they could gather up a new industry or industries to employ all of their people and create revenues to run their own governments.

Third, it would definitely leave everyone employed in the energy sector well … Unemployed. But I think the number of people working in the energy business are puny statistically compared to just the people starving in the third world much less across the globe.

Fourth, it would free up human resources to pursue humanitarian and technological efforts by reallocating all of the resources, engineering skills and professionals to other existing problems like creating new systems for health care, alleviating issues around growing food and things of that nature. So whatever unemployment would result would be short-lived.

Fifth, it would help in repairing and increasing infrastructure on every continent and for every nation on earth.

Largely I think it would be a good thing for most, but initially a bad thing for the rest.

Which is probably why the oil companies would likely assassinate anyone that came up with free energy alternatives that were immediately viable.

admin answers:

One issue at a time: Common sense does not just come to you, either you have it or you don’t. The actions of this Congress has shown little in the common sense area over the last 19 months. They will do with immigration what furthers the agenda that Obama desires to fulfill. Maybe you think that full Socialism is a great idea, but be careful of what you wish for, you just might get it.
The millionaires of which you speak are people like Soros and Buffet that are big Democrat supporters. They will not be placing taxes on these people who spend millions in support of the party. Like most of the Democrat rich, most very well to do have their monies buried in tax free investments that generate no taxable revenue. You once again have fallen for the old class warfare scheme that Marx, Alinsky and other Communist style proponents use to gain power.
Your disdain for Reagan is evidently a political bias that ignores the fact that it was a Democrat Congress that passed the Reagan tax cuts into law. To blame Reagan is to also blame the Democrats for the trickle down economy, which by the way worked very well on behalf of the total economy. Do some research and add some reality to your arguments, it just might change your outlook when facts are used. Furthermore, if you speak of the rich, how that $2 million dollar wedding for Chelsea? The rich are not just conservatives.